Title: Exploitation Geologist (WORD version )

Industry: Petroleum

Function: Corporate Services

Value-Added Results
Performance Standards
New reserves

• New trends and prospects

• 1 million barrels of reserves additions net to the Company.

• 30%—50% overall success rate on wildcat drilling.

• Average of 1 economically successful major prospect/year.

• Team and VP Exploration are satisfied that the amount of effort matches the potential.

Subsurface interpretations • Management is satisfied that:

• Seismic data ties together.

• Log correlations look reasonable and are integrated with seismic data.

• All the available data is used and fits the interpretations.

• Conforms to known models.

• Fits engineering data.

• Looks beyond known producing horizons.

• Interpretations identify new opportunities.

• Meets agreed-upon deadline.

• Management agrees that time spent matches potential.

• Exceeds = Maps and interpretations fit the drilling data.

Recognition of depositional environment • VP Exploration is satisfied that there is:

• Integration among log, seismic and production data.

• Integration of data outside the local trend into a regional depositional framework.

• Log analysis • Other team members are satisfied that the interpretation:

• Integrate all relevant data.

• Makes a decision.

• Volumetric maps

• Structure map

• Isopach map

• Recovery factors

• Other team members are satisfied that the maps:

• Have contours that match the structural and net sand maps.

• Are consistent with the reservoir and seismic data.

• Wildcat well information matches the maps.

• Wildcat well production matches the predicted recovery factor.

Log correlation and zone identification • Geophysicist and other team members are satisfied that the correlations and zones:

• Differentiate between structural and stratigraphic effects.

• Are consistent with all available data.

• Met agreed-upon deadline.

Drill well objectives and design criteria • Operations Manager and Drilling Engineer are satisfied that the:

• Formation objectives are clearly identified.

• Evaluation procedures fit the region and are cost-effective.

• Well parameters are accurate.

Risk assessment • Team members and management say risk looks realistic based on appropriate weighting of all available data.
Well performance predictions • Team members and management say the exploration objectives properly weigh and incorporate all relevant data.

• Exceeds = Well comes in as projected or better.

Reserves estimate • VP Exploration is satisfied that the subsurface, seismic and nearby production data agree.

• Exceeds = Actual well reserves match predictions.

Completed projects • Work isn’t held up waiting for answers.

• Schedule is met.

• Exceeds = Comes in ahead of schedule and/or below budget.